The Bicycle Derailleur
A dozen gear ratios, chosen with a lever instead of a gearbox.
Read spotlight →Guiding questionHow can mechanical systems be incorporated into product design?
B3.3 is the calculating half of mechanisms, where the ideas from A3.3 turn into design decisions instead of descriptions. Mechanical advantage, velocity ratio and efficiency are the three numbers that let you state what a mechanism is doing for the user. They are the difference between "this gear train makes it easier" and "this gear train trades a factor of four in speed for a factor of four in torque, which is why the user can lift it at all".
Two pieces of advice. Efficiency is the objective students skip most often and the one that matters most in practice, because no real mechanism gives back everything you put into it and the losses are exactly where the design choices live. And do the problems by hand until the relationships feel obvious. These questions are multi-step, the marks sit in the working rather than the final figure, and a habit of showing what you did is worth building now rather than in May.
Students must be able toCalculate mechanical advantage in gear, pulley, belt and lever systems.
Mechanical advantage (MA) is the ratio of the output load to the input effort in a machine. For a belt drive or pulley system, MA is determined by the ratio of pulley diameters, or equivalently by the inverse ratio of rotational speeds:
MA = Load / Effort = d₂ / d₁ = N₁ / N₂
where d₂ is the driven (output) pulley diameter, d₁ is the drive (input) pulley diameter, N₁ is the input speed and N₂ is the output speed.
Effect on torque and speed:
Characteristics of belt drives: Belts transmit power by friction between belt and pulley. They are quiet, cost-effective, and can span large distances between shafts. Under heavy loads, belts can slip: this protects components from shock overload but reduces efficiency and speed accuracy. V-belts wedge into grooves to increase friction and reduce slip.
Worked example (belt drive MA)
| Given | Formula | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Drive pulley d₁ = 100 mm, driven d₂ = 300 mm | MA = d₂ / d₁ | MA = 300 / 100 = 3 |
| MA = 3, input speed N₁ = 300 rpm | N₂ = N₁ / MA | N₂ = 300 / 3 = 100 rpm |
| The driven pulley produces 3× the torque but rotates at 1/3 the speed. | ||
Enter driver and driven sizes (teeth count or diameter, any consistent unit) for one stage, or add stages for a compound drive. Add an input speed and/or torque to see the output.
Students must be able toCalculate velocity ratios for gear-, pulley- and belt-driven systems.
The velocity ratio (VR) describes how much the rotational speed changes from input to output. It is always written as driven over driver. In a perfect machine with no friction, VR and MA are equal, so a system that multiplies force by 3 also divides speed by 3. In a real machine some input is lost to friction, so the actual MA is always a little lower than the VR. That gap is what efficiency measures.
For a simple belt drive or pulley:
VR = d₂ / d₁ = N₁ / N₂
Crossed belt drives reverse the rotation direction of the driven pulley: the belt crosses between the two pulleys. The VR formula is unchanged; only the direction differs.
Compound belt drives connect multiple pulley pairs in series. Two pulleys share a common shaft so that when the first driven pulley rotates, it drives the next stage. The total VR is the product of each stage's VR:
VR_total = VR₁ × VR₂ × VR₃ …
For gear trains, VR is calculated using the number of teeth instead of pulley diameters:
VR = T_driven / T_driver = N_driver / N_driven
| System type | VR formula | Direction change? |
|---|---|---|
| Simple belt / pulley | d₂ / d₁ | No |
| Crossed belt | d₂ / d₁ | Yes: reverses |
| Compound belt | VR₁ × VR₂ × … | Depends on stages |
| Gear pair | T_driven / T_driver | Yes: reverses |
| Compound gear train | VR₁ × VR₂ × … | Depends on stages |
Students must be able toCalculate efficiency for gear- and belt-driven systems.
Efficiency (η) is the fraction of input power that reaches the output as useful work. No real machine reaches 100%: some energy is always lost to friction and heat.
η = (P_out / P_in) × 100%
Power in gear systems is the product of torque and angular velocity:
P = τ × ω where ω = N × (2π / 60) rad/s
To convert rpm to rad/s, multiply by 2π and divide by 60.
Power in belt drives is transmitted by the difference in belt tensions between the tight side and the slack side:
P = F_E × v_belt where F_E = T₊ − T₋
T₊ is the tight-side tension and T₋ is the slack-side tension. Belt speed v_belt = π × d₁ × N₁ / 60 (m/s, with d₁ in metres).
Why real systems fall short of 100%:
Worked example (gear power and efficiency)
| Step | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Convert speed to rad/s | ω = 120 × (2π / 60) | 12.57 rad/s |
| Calculate input power | P = τ × ω = 1.2 Nm × 12.57 | 15.1 W |
| Calculate efficiency | η = (13.5 / 15.1) × 100% | 89% |
Work in the order shown: convert rpm to rad/s first, then find power, then compare output with input. Forgetting the rpm conversion is the most common mistake in this calculation.
A well-lubricated gear train can run at 95–98% efficient; a worm gear can sit under 50%. A petrol engine typically wastes 70–80% of its fuel energy as heat before any of it reaches the wheels; an electric drivetrain converts roughly 85–90% of its input into motion. Closing that gap almost always costs something: precision-ground gears cost more than stamped ones, better bearings cost more than bushings, and most loss-reduction measures add mass, complexity or price.
Find a real machine's published efficiency figure. Is the gap between that number and 100% a design failure, or the correct trade-off given what a more efficient version would cost, weigh or take to manufacture? At what point does chasing the last few percent of efficiency stop being worth it?
Students must be able toCalculate gear ratios and belt-driven system ratios, calculate the speed of rotation of a gear system at several points including initial input and final output speed, and construct systems that use gears to increase or decrease speed and motion.
Gear and belt systems are selected by designers to achieve specific combinations of speed, torque and direction. Choosing the right system requires calculating what will happen at each stage of the mechanism.
Direction of rotation in gear trains: In a simple gear train, adjacent gears rotate in opposite directions. An idler gear placed between two gears reverses direction again: the output then turns the same way as the input without changing the speed ratio. Belts and pulleys do not reverse direction (unless crossed).
Compound gear trains mount two gears on a shared shaft. This allows large speed changes in a compact space. The total velocity ratio is the product of each gear pair's ratio:
VR_total = VR₁ × VR₂ × VR₃ …
Calculating speed at multiple stages: Work stage by stage. For each gear pair: N_out = N_in × (T_driver / T_driven). For each belt stage: N_out = N_in × (d_drive / d_driven).
Overdrive gearboxes have VR < 1, meaning output speed is greater than input speed but output torque is reduced. Used in bicycle derailleur top gears and vehicle transmissions during motorway cruising, where higher speed and less force are needed.
Worked example (compound belt drive, multi-stage)
| Stage | Pulley diameters | VR | Output speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | d₁ = 400 mm → d₂ = 200 mm | VR₁ = 200/400 = 0.5 | N₂ = 60 × (400/200) = 120 rpm |
| Stage 2 | d₃ = 80 mm → d₄ = 50 mm | VR₂ = 50/80 = 0.625 | N₄ = 120 × (80/50) = 192 rpm |
| Overall | VR_total = 0.5 × 0.625 = 0.3125 | N₄ = 192 rpm (input N₁ = 60 rpm) | |
For compound belt drives, you cannot divide the final pulley diameter by the first: you must multiply individual stage VRs. A common exam mistake is treating it like a simple two-pulley system.
A dozen gear ratios, chosen with a lever instead of a gearbox.
Read spotlight →Students must be able toAnalyse how cam systems translate rotary motion into reciprocating motion, construct mechanical systems that use cams, and interpret diagrams that represent the use of cams in a system.
A cam is a specially shaped rotating component. A follower is held against its surface and is pushed up and down as the cam rotates, converting continuous rotary motion into reciprocating (back-and-forth) motion. The cam's profile (its outline shape) determines exactly how the follower moves.
Cam motion phases:
Follower types: knife-edge (precise but wears quickly), roller (reduces friction, suited to most applications), flat-faced (suited to high-speed cams with gentle profiles).
Historical development: Trip hammers in Han Dynasty China (206 BCE–220 CE) used cams driven by water wheels to produce a hammering action: one of the earliest uses of rotary-to-reciprocating conversion. In the 12th century, Ismail al-Jazari described programmable camshafts in his Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices. His "Mechanical Servant" automaton used cam lobes on a hidden shaft to produce a sequence of controlled movements: an early form of mechanical programming.
Modern applications:
Students must be able toAnalyse the Load (L), Effort (E) and Fulcrum, calculate Load (L) and Effort (E), construct mechanical systems that use levers, and interpret diagrams that represent the use of levers in a system.
A lever is a rigid beam that rotates about a fixed point called the fulcrum (F). By varying the positions of the effort (E) and load (L) relative to the fulcrum, a lever can multiply force, speed, or distance.
Equilibrium condition: for a lever in balance, the turning moments on each side of the fulcrum must be equal:
E × effort arm = L × load arm → MA = load arm / effort arm
Oblique forces: when a force acts at angle θ to the lever rather than perpendicular to it, only the perpendicular component creates a turning moment. Giovanni Batista Benedetti (16th century) recognised this and showed the effective force can be resolved using trigonometry:
(E × sin θ) × effort arm = L × load arm
Biomechanics (Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, 1608–1679), the father of biomechanics, proved that most joints in the human body act as third-class levers. Muscle insertion points sit close to the joint (very short effort arm), so large muscular forces produce small loads but move the limb end through a large distance. Human body levers are speed and distance magnifiers, not force multipliers: a design essential for throwing, writing, reaching and all fine motor skills. If the body used second-class levers at the elbow, we would be extraordinarily strong but too slow for daily tasks.
| Class | Position of F, E, L | MA | Example | 中文示例 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First class | F between E and L | Can be >1 or <1 | Crowbar, scissors, seesaw | 撬棍、剪刀、跷跷板 |
| Second class | L between F and E | Always >1 | Wheelbarrow, nutcracker | 独轮车、胡桃夹 |
| Third class | E between F and L | Always <1 | Bicep curl, tweezers, shovel | 肱二头肌弯举、镊子、铁锹 |
Worked example (oblique force, bicep curl)
| Step | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Load torque | 50 N × 0.35 m | 17.5 Nm |
| Equilibrium with oblique effort (θ = 75°) | (E × sin 75°) × 0.04 = 17.5 | E × 0.966 × 0.04 = 17.5 |
| Solve for E | E = 17.5 / (0.966 × 0.04) | E ≈ 453 N |
| Mechanical advantage | MA = 50 / 453 | MA ≈ 0.11 |
MA = 0.11 confirms this is a third-class lever. The body exerts ~453 N to lift a 50 N load, but the hand moves ~35 cm for every ~3 cm of muscle contraction. Speed and range of motion are gained at the expense of force.
Ten questions covering all six learning objectives. Select one answer per question, then click "Check all answers" to see your score and the explanations.
A potter's wheel is driven by an electric motor through a flat belt. The potter needs the wheelhead to turn slowly with enough torque that pressing clay against it does not slow it down.
The motor runs at its most efficient speed and cannot usefully be run slower.
Table 1: Potter's wheel drive
| Component | Value |
|---|---|
| Motor pulley diameter | 60 mm |
| Wheelhead pulley diameter | 420 mm |
| Motor speed | 1400 rpm |
| Belt type | Flat, tensioned by a jockey pulley |
| Motor power | 250 W |
(a) State the type of motion transmitted by the belt drive, see Table 1. [1]
(b) Apply the velocity ratio to determine the wheelhead speed, see Table 1. [2]
(c) Explain why the speed reduction increases the torque available at the wheelhead, see Table 1. [3]
(a) Rotary motion.
(b) Velocity ratio = driven diameter ÷ driver diameter = 420 ÷ 60 = 7 : 1. Wheelhead speed = 1400 ÷ 7 = 200 rpm, which is a workable throwing speed.
(c) Power is the product of torque and rotational speed, so for a given power a drive that reduces speed must increase torque in the same proportion. The belt carries the motor's 250 W to the wheelhead less whatever friction takes, and because the wheelhead turns seven times slower, the torque there is close to seven times the motor's. The physical reason is the difference in radius: the belt tension acts at 30 mm from the motor shaft and at 210 mm from the wheelhead shaft, so the same force produces seven times the moment about the larger pulley. This is what the potter needs, because throwing means pressing hard against clay off the centre of the wheel, which applies a substantial opposing torque, and a wheel that lost speed under the hands would be unusable. The motor could not deliver that torque directly at any speed, so the belt drive is converting an output the motor can produce into one the task requires.
(a) • Rotary ✓
Award [1] for the correct type of motion up to [1 max].
(b) Velocity ratios for gear-, pulley- and belt-driven systems can be calculated.
• VR = driven diameter ÷ driver diameter = 420 ÷ 60 = 7 ✓
• Wheelhead speed = 1400 ÷ 7 = 200 rpm ✓
Award [1] for the correct velocity ratio and [1] for the correct output speed, up to [2 max]. Award [1] only where the method is correct but the arithmetic is not.
(c) Mechanical systems are used to increase or decrease the speed, direction or power of a motion, and can provide a mechanical advantage.
• Power is the product of torque and rotational speed ✓
• For a given power, reducing speed must increase torque in proportion ✓
• The belt carries 250 W to the wheelhead, less friction losses ✓
• The wheelhead turns seven times slower, so torque is close to seven times the motor's ✓
• Belt tension acts at 30 mm from the motor shaft and 210 mm from the wheelhead shaft ✓
• The same belt force produces seven times the moment about the larger pulley ✓
• Throwing applies a substantial opposing torque off the wheel centre ✓
• A wheel that lost speed under the potter's hands would be unusable ✓
• The motor cannot deliver that torque directly at any speed ✓
• The drive converts an output the motor can produce into one the task requires ✓
Award [1] for each relevant reason / cause explaining the torque increase up to [3 max]. Award a maximum of [2] where the response does not link power, torque and speed.
A nutcracker is two hinged arms. A walnut placed near the hinge is cracked by squeezing the far ends of the arms together.
Table 2: Nutcracker dimensions and forces
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Distance from hinge to nut | 30 mm |
| Distance from hinge to hand | 150 mm |
| Force needed to crack a walnut | 240 N |
| Typical adult grip force available | 250–400 N |
| Grip force available, reduced hand strength | 60–100 N |
(a) State the class of lever formed by each arm of the nutcracker, see Table 2. [1]
(b) Apply the principle of moments to determine the hand force needed to crack the walnut, see Table 2. [2]
(c) Evaluate the nutcracker's suitability for a user with reduced hand strength, see Table 2. [3]
(a) Second class, because the load sits between the fulcrum and the effort.
(b) Taking moments about the hinge, effort × 150 = 240 × 30, so effort = 7200 ÷ 150 = 48 N. The mechanical advantage is 150 ÷ 30 = 5.
(c) The nutcracker suits this user well. The 48 N required sits comfortably inside the 60 to 100 N a user with reduced hand strength can produce, so a task needing 240 N directly, which is far beyond them, becomes achievable. The mechanical advantage of 5 is what makes that possible, and it costs only distance: the hands travel five times as far as the nut is squeezed, which is not a limitation on a movement of a few millimetres. Two things qualify this. The margin is narrower than it appears, because a user at the bottom of the 60 N range has only 12 N of headroom, and a larger or harder nut needing more than 240 N would exceed what they can produce. The bigger problem is not the force but the grip: a user with reduced strength usually has reduced control too, and this design requires both hands to hold two arms in position while squeezing a rounded nut that can shoot out. A lever-and-cup design that holds the nut and needs only one hand would serve the same user better, so the mechanism is well suited and the way the user has to hold it is not.
(a) Levers comprise a beam acting on a fulcrum and are classed based on the relative position of the fulcrum to an applied load and effort.
• Second class ✓
Award [1] for the correct lever class up to [1 max].
(b) Mechanical advantage of a system can be calculated.
• Moments about the hinge: effort × 150 = 240 × 30 ✓
• Effort = 7200 ÷ 150 = 48 N ✓
• Mechanical advantage = 150 ÷ 30 = 5 ✓
Award [1] for correct application of moments and [1] for the correct hand force, up to [2 max]. Award [1] where the method is correct but the arithmetic is not.
(c) Levers reduce the effort needed to exert a force and move a load.
Strengths:
• 48 N sits comfortably inside the 60 to 100 N available to this user ✓
• A task needing 240 N directly, far beyond them, becomes achievable ✓
• A mechanical advantage of 5 is what makes it possible ✓
• The cost is distance, and the hands travelling five times as far is no burden over a few millimetres ✓
• No power, mechanism or maintenance required ✓
Limitations:
• A user at the bottom of the 60 N range has only 12 N of headroom ✓
• A larger or harder nut needing more than 240 N would exceed their capability ✓
• Reduced strength usually accompanies reduced control ✓
• The design requires both hands to hold two arms in position ✓
• A rounded nut can shoot out when it cracks ✓
• Sustained squeezing is harder than a brief peak for a user with arthritis ✓
Judgment:
• The mechanism suits the user; the way it must be held does not ✓
• A lever-and-cup design holding the nut and needing one hand would serve better ✓
Award [1] for each distinct strength / limitation, leading to an appraisal of the nutcracker's suitability, up to [3 max]. Award a maximum of [2] where only strengths or only limitations are given.
A sailing boat trims its sails with a hand-cranked winch. A rope is wrapped around a drum, and the crew turns a removable handle to pull the rope in against the load of the wind in the sail.
The winch has two gear ratios, selected by reversing the direction the handle is turned.
(a) Identify two types of motion present when the crew hauls a rope in on the winch. [2]
Table 3: Winch specification
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Handle length | 250 mm |
| Drum radius | 40 mm |
| Gear ratio, first speed | 1 : 1 |
| Gear ratio, second speed | 4.4 : 1 reduction |
| Efficiency | 90 % |
| Rope load when close-hauled | 2400 N |
(b) Apply the concept of mechanical advantage to outline why second speed is needed when close-hauled, see Table 3. [2]
The winch is 90 % efficient, so 10 % of the crew's input is lost within the mechanism.
(c) Describe where the lost 10 % goes in a winch of this kind, see Table 3. [2]
The winch contains a pawl that allows the drum to turn only in the hauling direction. An owner proposes an electric winch that removes the handle and the two speeds, driving the drum directly from a motor at a single speed.
(d) Explain the consequences of replacing the two-speed hand winch with a single-speed electric one, see Table 3. [4]
(a) Rotary, at the handle, gears and drum; and linear, in the rope being hauled in.
(b) In first speed the mechanical advantage is just the handle-to-drum ratio, 250 ÷ 40 = 6.25, so holding 2400 N of rope load needs about 384 N at the handle, which is more than a crew member can sustain. Second speed multiplies that by the 4.4 : 1 gear reduction to give a mechanical advantage of about 27.5, bringing the handle force down to roughly 87 N before losses, which is a force a person can turn repeatedly.
(c) Most of it is friction between sliding surfaces: the gear teeth sliding against each other as they mesh, the drum and gear shafts turning in their bearings, and the pawl dragging over its ratchet on every revolution. A smaller part goes into deforming the rope as it bends around the drum and into the seals keeping salt water out, and all of it ends up as heat in the winch body.
(d) The change trades away the crew's control over force and speed in exchange for removing their effort, and whether that is worthwhile depends on what the winch is for.
The gain is straightforward. A 2400 N rope load takes real physical work to haul, and second speed only reduces the force by increasing the number of turns, so trimming a sail close-hauled is slow and tiring. A motor removes that entirely, which matters most for a short-handed or elderly crew, and it lets one person trim a sail that would otherwise need two.
The loss is the two speeds. The hand winch is not two-speed for convenience; it exists because the load varies enormously through a single operation. Most of the rope is pulled in with almost no tension, and first speed hauls it quickly, then the last part is taken up under full load in second speed at high mechanical advantage. A single-speed motor must be geared for the worst case, so the whole operation runs at the slow ratio and the fast phase disappears, which makes routine trimming slower than it was by hand.
The more serious consequence is the loss of feedback. A crew member turning a handle feels the load directly, and that is how they know the sail is sheeted correctly or that the rope has jammed. A motor feels nothing and will keep pulling, so a rope caught on a cleat, or a hand caught in a turn on the drum, is pulled with the full force of the motor rather than stopping when a person cannot turn the handle. That safety property was a by-product of the hand winch and has to be replaced deliberately with a load sensor and cut-out.
A boat also has to keep working when its electrics fail, so the electric winch needs to retain the handle socket and the pawl so it can be cranked manually. In practice the right answer is not to replace the mechanism but to add a motor to it, keeping both speeds and the manual fallback.
(a) There are four types of motion involved in mechanical systems.
• Rotary, at the handle, gears and drum ✓
• Linear, in the rope being hauled ✓
• Oscillating, at the pawl ✓
• Reciprocating, if the pawl is described over its full cycle ✓
Award [1] for each relevant type of motion up to [2 max].
(b) Mechanical advantage of a system can be calculated.
• First speed MA = handle length ÷ drum radius = 250 ÷ 40 = 6.25 ✓
• Handle force in first speed ≈ 2400 ÷ 6.25 = 384 N, more than a crew member can sustain ✓
• Second speed multiplies by the 4.4 : 1 gear reduction ✓
• Overall MA ≈ 6.25 × 4.4 = 27.5 ✓
• Handle force ≈ 2400 ÷ 27.5 ≈ 87 N before losses, which a person can turn repeatedly ✓
Award [1] for correctly applying mechanical advantage and [1] for relating the result to what a crew member can produce, up to [2 max]. Accept answers that account for the 90 % efficiency.
(c) Efficiency can be calculated, and real systems have efficiency less than 100 %.
• Friction between gear teeth sliding as they mesh ✓
• Friction in the bearings supporting the drum and gear shafts ✓
• The pawl dragging over its ratchet on every revolution ✓
• Deformation of the rope as it bends around the drum ✓
• Friction in the seals keeping salt water out ✓
• Viscous drag in the grease ✓
• All losses appear as heat in the winch body ✓
• Wear and corrosion increase these losses over the winch's life ✓
Award [1] for each detail, leading to an account of where the lost energy goes, up to [2 max]. Credit responses that identify heat as the final form.
(d) Mechanical systems convert an input into an output, and gear ratios are selected to match a varying load.
Gains:
• A 2400 N rope load takes real physical work, and second speed only trades force for turns ✓
• A motor removes the crew's effort entirely ✓
• Most valuable for a short-handed or elderly crew ✓
• One person can trim a sail that would otherwise need two ✓
• Consistent hauling speed regardless of crew fatigue ✓
Loss of the two speeds:
• The two speeds exist because the load varies enormously through one operation ✓
• Most of the rope is pulled in at almost no tension, then the last part under full load ✓
• A single-speed motor must be geared for the worst case ✓
• The whole operation runs at the slow ratio and the fast phase disappears ✓
• Routine trimming becomes slower than it was by hand ✓
Loss of feedback:
• A crew member turning a handle feels the load directly ✓
• That is how they know the sail is sheeted correctly or the rope has jammed ✓
• A motor feels nothing and keeps pulling ✓
• A jammed rope or a trapped hand is pulled with the motor's full force ✓
• The hand winch's safety property was a by-product and must be replaced deliberately ✓
• A load sensor and cut-out become necessary ✓
Other consequences:
• A boat must keep working when its electrics fail ✓
• The handle socket and pawl should be retained for manual operation ✓
• Electrical load on the boat's batteries increases ✓
• Motor and wiring must survive a salt water environment ✓
Judgment:
• The better solution is to add a motor to the existing mechanism rather than replace it ✓
• That keeps both ratios and the manual fallback ✓
Award [1] for each relevant detail / reason / cause relating to the consequences of the substitution up to [4 max]. Award a maximum of [3] where the response does not address the loss of the second ratio or the loss of feedback. Credit responses that reach a judgment.
Linking Questions